China's financial excess ramble

This paper is to point to talk about the excess revenues (tax revenue) year-on-year growth faster than at the same entity economy of GDP growth rate of year-on-year, or that financial income equivalent to the proportion of GDP increased year by year, the controversial topic recently. First look at the next table, data from the national bureau of statistics, the ministry of finance and the state administration of taxation public information, with comparable for all use current prices, tax for the national tax (including the tax departments such as the collection of customs, etc) net income number, minus the export tax rebate has. The table can be concluded that the GDP over the past 10 years in the compound annual growth rate of 15.40% (current prices, a number of common constant price several high), financial income and tax revenues in the compound annual growth rate were 19.77% and 19.00%. This shows that the excess don't like some of the system of friends said was due to factors caused by price calculated,baseball hats eliminate price factors, finance income tax, income growth has also long time was significantly higher than the entity economy growth. The excess is yes, the reason is more complicated, the change of the structure of real economy, also have a tax system arrangement of change. Statistics in the past 30 years (1981-2010) China's finance income proportion of GDP will find that its conditions experienced a slow flat U glyph. The last time in 20% of the time is 1986 years (20.7%), back to 20% above is in 2009 (20.4%). Cut out the quantity and the system analysis, reality experience whether the relatively low proportion of time is China's economic vitality strongest stage, the proportion of the value indicates whether a system return return factors? Worth pondering, 30 years ago how China economic conditions and not "distant story". Above data only reflect the part of the problem, some study of Chinese people macro tax burden level, they ignored or inconvenient part of the speech is those who should be but not included in the part of the public finance income. The international recognized system is all government income is finance income, are included in the budget management, China will have a significant portion of the government not classified as finance income income, of course, is not included in the budget, including: did not include the budget management of administrative fees and fines, such as civil aviation construction funds government fund income, the transfer of state-owned land use right income, foreign exchange business income, social security funds, according to the statistics in 2007 did not include the aggregate these budget more than 4 trillion yuan, roughly equivalent to the current financial revenue by 70-80%, all the caliber statistics, China's finance income index will be more surprising. China's finance income is about 90% tax income, talks about the tax, have a characteristic can't avoid, is tax subject (enterprise or individual) must be greater than the actual pay total tax, the difference is in the various tax subject fees, fines, and the recourse cable roam bribe, including they are practical burden. The forehead to roam in a quite long time period is not change, it may depend on total tax and tax technicians? We assume that this number is equivalent to 2% of the income tax announced when not exaggerated, if it is so a year will be more than one hundred billion yuan. China's financial excess, it covered another problem is that China's tax cost is too high. According to the state administration of taxation provide information, by the end of 2009, the national tax system has 3567 budget unit, 580600 cadres and employees, 2010 spending budget 80.4 billion yuan, accounting for current tax department shall be responsible for the organization of the tax revenue (less than total tax revenue, and the customs and other department are taxation) of 1.20%, considering that there is a huge land tax system and also some non-budgetary expenditures, China's tax cost estimate that up to 3%, this in the world, is a high ratio, precious tax consumption tax in process become paradox, the reality is it's not worth it. Actually the general public speaking, compared to the above-mentioned problems, they care more about the financial revenues of the excess in where, but this is a basic in China this HuTuZhang. As mentioned above,sunglasses shop the diameter of the China statistics government revenues estimated that 40% or so not included in the budget, the government reports of course not explain the spending, into the part of the budget, often also have been vague, involves detailed the financial revenues of the subjects with digital, often 1, 2 page quickly sent, makers no one can get the effective information. This don't and other countries than (Obama just to the American congress 2012 fiscal year the federal government budget page 216), compared with China's only in Hong Kong, the financial year 2011-12 government budget reached 107 page, is detailed digital, charts, analysis, notes, the supplements, theory China's financial affairs than Hong Kong multifarious every year in China, the government budget into hundreds of pages of the book is a normal, but the reality is a brief terrible. Most ordinary people from the form and in fact can feel the benefits of financial excess, this is the most the place of the excess watch.

see more:Japan with strong earthquakes "economic tsunami"
Shanghai cure of the "new scheme" or "the old bottled both tasteful"